13 Comments
User's avatar
Bruce's avatar

This video came out about three years ago. Everything that Ray discusses is happening and a hot war will likely happen. Only difference between other cycles is that the two most powerful countries are, in my opinion, somewhat equal in their military abilities. Regardless of who wins the war, if it goes nuclear, we’re all as good as dead.

If the war is conventional, I believe China will be the winner.

Dump your fiat currency regardless what country you’re in and stock up on PM if you can find them.

As a side note, would really like to see the US gold stockpile as I suspect it isn’t there. If that’s true the price of gold will go up by multiples.

Expand full comment
Richard Thorn's avatar

An excellent educational communication. It should be compulsory viewing!

Expand full comment
Mike Noone's avatar

Ray Dalio is one of the great students of economies and markets. Ignore him at your peril!

Expand full comment
Ryan's avatar

A superb video, thanks for the link to this.

Expand full comment
Market Trends For Friends's avatar

The problem is that the weapons can not be created, the dummies gave out dividend and share buybacks and let china have the supply lines and processing. A war can not happen because you can’t produce the high tech weapons, I am assuming Russia and china know this. Fastest forecast for getting a equal footing is 2040, assuming we get to work. Greed of investors putting us in this position, why can’t the weapon contractors invest and build the supply instead of buying back shares and paying dividends. Crazy.

Expand full comment
Th232's avatar

An analyst said this week that when applying EWT, we need to look at a longer time horizon. Looking at gold, at the GSR, we can go back 200, 500 or even 2000 years. The longer we go back, the sharper our current picture getting?

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar
Nov 12Edited

Do other people also get a gaslighting NWO disclaimer-cum-disinformation notice below this youtube video referring to NWO Wikipedia?

Wikipedia • Als Neue Weltordnung wird in verschiedenen Verschwörungstheorien das angebliche Ziel von Eliten und Geheimgesellschaften bezeichnet, eine autoritäre, supranationale Weltregierung zu errichten. Solche Theorien wurden zu Beginn der 1990er Jahre in den Vereinigten Staaten populär.

Expand full comment
Mark Brown's avatar

It certainly looks like gaslighting. The reference to NWO is not the sense in which Ray Dalio uses it.

Yes. I got "Wikipedia • The New World Order is a term often used in conspiracy theories which hypothesize a secretly emerging totalitarian world government."

The Ministry of Truth wouldn't want the ordinary man (or woman, or any of the other 105 gender identities) to know what is going on or what to do about it would they?

Expand full comment
Richard Thorn's avatar

Another phrase that could have been used is 'new operating paradigm' an underlying set of principles, practices, and assumptions that guide how a system, organization, or individual operates. This would equate with Bretton Woods the United Nations etc after WW2. However, New Word Order works for me!

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar
Nov 12Edited

I know it is not in the sense that Dalio uses it.

Yeah - the ordinary man is as dumb as a box of rocks. He might wake up in the coming gulags - but personally, I would not even put fiat toilet paper on it LOL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfrjWFhOlEo&list=RDlfrjWFhOlEo&start_radio=1

Expand full comment
Gordon Groves's avatar

the only way any of us won't wake up in the gulag, which isn't coming but is here now, is if we're already deceased due to poisoned food and medicines and murderous oligarchs and politicians.

Expand full comment
Gordon Groves's avatar

I find Ray to be way too polite and evasive

Expand full comment
Rob Goldsack's avatar

Because he's one of them? You don't get to be a billionaire unless you join the club me thinks

Expand full comment